In today's segment, first a rant about rampant bigatry fueled idiocy plaguing the US, then segwaying into what you can't do under dictatorship but can when free.

Oklahoma became the first state to pass a law banning Shariah, which means Islamic law. Oklahoma also very shortly thereafter became the first state to have such a law declared unconstitutional. Now there are movements in other places, including South Carolina, Texas, Nevada, Georgia, and Wyoming, trying to pass similar measures. When some of the lawmakers in such places are asked if ever Shariah was an issue, they state the obvious, NO. Then why the rush to pass such idiotic unconstitutional measures? To protect our citizenry, some say, from the scourge of Shariah.

What is it that is so scary and morbid about the Shariah? Is it that our system of law and justice is in many ways based on what the Shariah brought forth 1400 years ago?

Or is it strictly that the hate mongers would have you think that this dark cloud of Shariah is invading our nations and we must take action to prevent it?

I will let you decide. Colbert's segment on sharia previously posted is quite insightful and enjoyable.

Now to the fun section.

In Malawi, lawmakers are concerned about the behavior of their citizenry. Illicit behavior that people were fearful of engaging in under the previous dictator rule is now becoming rampant. And the lawmakers are going to put a stop to it...

Read for yourself